News · Updated: · BOKKA Team

Retrofitting Old Houses with PIR Boards — Energy Upgrade Guide

Retrofitting Old Houses with PIR Boards — Energy Upgrade Guide

Energy retrofit of old houses with PIR boards — a comprehensive guide

Renovating a building from the 1950s–1980s is now one of the most common investments on the property market. Attractive plots in good locations, inherited family houses, tenement buildings with character — all share one common problem: catastrophic energy performance. The heat transfer coefficient of external walls in such buildings often exceeds 1.2 W/m²K, while WT 2021 (Polish Technical Conditions 2021) require U ≤ 0.20 W/m²K. Effective thermal upgrade therefore requires improving insulation performance up to sixfold — and this is exactly where PIR boards demonstrate their advantage over traditional materials.

Diagnosis: where an old house loses heat

Buildings erected before the late 1980s most often have no thermal insulation layer in the classical sense. At that time, three-layer constructions with a so-called “air cavity” between the load-bearing and outer wall were widely used — a solution that works only on paper, but in practice generates intense convection and thermal bridges at junctions.

Heat losses in a typical pre-1990 house break down as follows:

Building elementShare of heat lossU required by WT 2021
External walls25–35%≤ 0.20 W/m²K
Roof / flat roof25–30%≤ 0.15 W/m²K
Windows and doors15–25%≤ 0.90 W/m²K (window)
Ground-bearing floor10–15%≤ 0.30 W/m²K
Thermal bridges and ventilation10–20%

Without a thermal imaging camera survey, choosing the insulation thickness is a lottery. Thermography performed with a temperature difference of at least 15 °C between interior and exterior reveals real thermal bridges — ring beams, lintels, cantilevered balconies, poorly executed joints.

External vs. internal insulation — selection criteria

Insulating from the outside is always the preferred solution from a building physics standpoint: the dew point shifts to the outer side of the partition, the wall accumulates heat, and thermal bridges are effectively interrupted. The standard solution is an ETICS system using termPIR® ETX — a PIR board with glass fleece, vapour-permeable, holding European Technical Assessment ETA 17/0066 dedicated to external thermal insulation composite systems.

Technical note: in ETICS, PIR boards with aluminium facing (termPIR® AL, MAX 19 AL) must not be used — the gas-tight foil blocks water vapour diffusion and leads to destruction of the thin-coat render. Only the glass-fleece variant is intended for ETICS.

Insulating from the inside is justified when:

  • the façade has heritage value or is under conservation protection,
  • the building is located in dense urban development (tenement houses),
  • the external layer cannot be thickened due to building-line restrictions.

For internal insulation, the termPIR® AL/GK composite is used — a PIR board with gas-tight aluminium foil (acting as a vapour barrier) factory-bonded to a gypsum plasterboard. This solution eliminates the risk of condensation inside the partition, provides a ready-to-paint surface and is used in the heritage wall termPIR® AL/GK system.

Why PIR boards are optimal for old houses

The key parameter of any thermal insulation is the declared thermal conductivity λD. The lower the value, the thinner the layer that delivers the required U. For old houses — where there is often no room outside (building line, eaves) or inside (limited usable area) — the difference between PIR and traditional mineral wool/EPS is fundamental.

MaterialλD [W/(m·K)]Thickness for U = 0.20 W/m²K
termPIR® MAX 19 AL0.019~9.5 cm
termPIR® AL0.022~11 cm
termPIR® ETX0.025~12.5 cm
EPS 70 polystyrene0.038~19 cm
Mineral wool0.038–0.040~19–20 cm

For a roof partition (U ≤ 0.15 W/m²K under WT 2021) the difference is even more pronounced — PIR with λD 0.022 requires about 14.5 cm, while mineral wool with λD 0.038 needs as much as 25 cm.

Practical benefits of a thinner layer

In old houses with deep window reveals, adding a 20 cm wool layer makes the windows “drown” in the insulation, reduces daylight inside, and forces complete replacement of sills and metal flashings. PIR boards cut this intrusion in half — which also translates into lower labour costs and reduced loading on the structure.

Sequence of retrofit works

Insulation is never the first stage of renovation. The correct sequence is as follows:

  1. Moisture diagnostics — measure wall moisture content (acceptable ≤ 4% by weight for brick, ≤ 3% for hollow blocks). Damp walls require drying by injection or microwave methods.
  2. Repair of damp-proofing — restoration of horizontal foundation damp-proofing, perimeter drainage, vertical insulation of basement walls using termPIR® WS with enhanced moisture resistance.
  3. Replacement of windows and doors — joinery should be installed within the planned insulation layer (“layered” mounting), which eliminates the linear thermal bridge of the frame.
  4. Renovation of terraces, balconies, cornices — all elements protruding from the building envelope require reconstruction in a way that interrupts thermal bridges (thermal break connectors, cantilever insulation).
  5. Control thermography — measurement before insulation, for precise thickness selection and identification of critical points.
  6. Installation of thermal insulation — according to the selected system.
  7. Replacement of gutters, sills and flashings — adapted to the new partition thickness.

Roof and ceiling insulation — the most cost-effective investment

The roof generates 25–30% of heat loss, and the cost of insulating it is usually lower than the walls. In old houses with a pitched roof (habitable loft), the optimal solution is over-rafter termPIR® insulation, which completely eliminates thermal bridges at the rafters. If removing the roof covering is not feasible, the under-rafter variant is used.

For the ceiling slab above the top storey (unused attic), it is enough to lay termPIR® AL boards dry — without bonding, with joints sealed using aluminium tape — which provides a thermally full-value, dust-tight layer.

Frequently asked questions

Can an old house be insulated from the inside with PIR boards without a vapour barrier?
In most cases yes — provided a board with gas-tight aluminium facing is used, e.g. termPIR® AL/GK. The aluminium foil with sd > 1500 m acts as a vapour barrier, eliminating the risk of condensation inside the partition. The key is careful sealing of joints with aluminium tape and of connections to the substrate with a permanently plastic sealant. Every unsealed joint is a potential condensation point. For walls with high initial moisture content, prior diagnostics and drying are essential.
What thickness of PIR board should be chosen to insulate an old external wall?
To meet WT 2021 (U ≤ 0.20 W/m²K) in an ETICS system on an uninsulated solid brick wall (44 cm), about 12 cm of termPIR® ETX with λD 0.025 is enough. For 25 cm ceramic hollow block, about 14 cm is needed. For maximum energy efficiency (passive standard U ≤ 0.15) — 16–18 cm. Precise selection requires hygrothermal calculations for the specific partition — BOKKA's technical support performs such analyses free of charge.
Are PIR boards suitable for insulating basements and foundations?
Yes, with one caveat — for ground applications and direct contact with moisture, we use termPIR® WS, the variant with enhanced moisture resistance designed for foundations, plinths and ground-bearing floors. Standard termPIR® AL has an aluminium facing which can corrode in a damp environment — therefore it is not recommended for direct contact with the ground without proper waterproofing.
How long does the energy retrofit of an old house take to pay back?
For a 150 m² house with gas heating and total heat consumption of ~30,000 kWh/year, a comprehensive thermal upgrade reduces demand by 50–65%. At current gas prices this means savings of around PLN 5,000–8,000 per year. The investment cost (ETICS + roof + windows) pays back in 8–12 years, but funding from the Czyste Powietrze (Clean Air) programme (up to PLN 135,000) shortens this period to 4–6 years.
Are PIR boards fire-safe for residential buildings?
termPIR® boards with facings in a complete system achieve a fire reaction class of B-s2,d0 (difficult to ignite, limited smoke emission). In an ETICS system with a correctly executed thin-coat render, they meet fire safety requirements for residential buildings up to medium height (up to 25 m). For high-rise buildings (> 25 m) or those with specific fire safety requirements, GS MW mineral wool sandwich panels of class A2-s1,d0 (non-combustible) are available.

Related products and systems

Building systems

Read next